Trademark Licence Agreement
Permission to use marks. Channel brand-use is narrower; this is the IP instrument.
Licence, transfer, or jointly develop as named contracts. Channel brand-use is narrower than a trademark licence.
Licence, transfer, or jointly develop technology as named contracts.
One trademark or know-how licence is a single matter. A repeating licence program sits in a module.
Permission to use marks. Channel brand-use is narrower; this is the IP instrument.
Broader IP licence covering copyright, design, or mixed rights.
Transfer of technology, sometimes with a registration culture in Vietnam. The pack records what is transferred at a non-secret level.
People delivering know-how without a full licence grant.
Know-how that is not patented. Non-use NDA is the usual neighbour.
Patent licence. Field, territory, and remaining term are pack facts.
Franchise is heavier than brand-use. Malaysia’s Franchise Act is a destination hint, not a how-to.
Both sides invent. Foreground and background IP must be listed as facts the client already believes.
R&D collaboration, often with a university or a vendor lab.
Escrow of source so a licensee can survive vendor failure.
Work-for-hire or commissioned software. Ownership of the repo is a pack fact.
Your product under their brand, or the reverse. Channel and SaaS neighbours.
No. Channel brand-use is narrower, for local marketing under an appointment. A trademark licence is the IP instrument.
Sometimes the destination treats transfer as a registered event. Record what is transferred and whether a filing is already planned — as a gap, not a how-to.
When a licensee needs to survive vendor failure. Most first SaaS packs skip it. Mid-market buyers ask.